<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tabs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kov.eti.br/?feed=rss2&#038;p=24" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=24</link>
	<description>um hacker debiano que mora num lugar chamado mundo</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 07:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leandro</title>
		<link>http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=24#comment-2992</link>
		<dc:creator>Leandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 20:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=24#comment-2992</guid>
		<description>I hope, also, that tabs in Gnometris is just a joke.

I, too, don't like the "tabs everywhere" craze that instated on GUADEC, but since this can be turned off easily: go for it! I'll disable it right away.

When GNOME 2.0 was released, I didn't like it. I was used to GNOME 1.4 and all of its bells and whistles. Time passed and I realized how much cleaner layouts are the way to go. And, currently, GNOME brings both power and simplicity.

Even the KDE guys, who were so "let's add a button for everything", are changing their minds -- which is nice, because they have great apps that I don't use because GNOME made me feel different about interface clutter.

But... tabs everywhere? The UI Hall of Shame is unfortunately down ATM, but their chapter on tabs is fantastic and worth a read. I truly hope that GNOME don't turn into a tab hell like most of its examples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope, also, that tabs in Gnometris is just a joke.</p>
<p>I, too, don&#8217;t like the &#8220;tabs everywhere&#8221; craze that instated on GUADEC, but since this can be turned off easily: go for it! I&#8217;ll disable it right away.</p>
<p>When GNOME 2.0 was released, I didn&#8217;t like it. I was used to GNOME 1.4 and all of its bells and whistles. Time passed and I realized how much cleaner layouts are the way to go. And, currently, GNOME brings both power and simplicity.</p>
<p>Even the KDE guys, who were so &#8220;let&#8217;s add a button for everything&#8221;, are changing their minds &#8212; which is nice, because they have great apps that I don&#8217;t use because GNOME made me feel different about interface clutter.</p>
<p>But&#8230; tabs everywhere? The UI Hall of Shame is unfortunately down ATM, but their chapter on tabs is fantastic and worth a read. I truly hope that GNOME don&#8217;t turn into a tab hell like most of its examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kov</title>
		<link>http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=24#comment-2991</link>
		<dc:creator>kov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=24#comment-2991</guid>
		<description>What can I say? You're argument is sound IMHO and I have nothing against it. I believe I won't even be affected, since I don't ever use nautilus in browser mode. I'm just afraid of this being a trend that takes GNOME away from simplicity. Perhaps do the other way around, and make those kinds of changes not be the default, but enabled through gconf would be a good thing too. Thanks again for you attention!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can I say? You&#8217;re argument is sound IMHO and I have nothing against it. I believe I won&#8217;t even be affected, since I don&#8217;t ever use nautilus in browser mode. I&#8217;m just afraid of this being a trend that takes GNOME away from simplicity. Perhaps do the other way around, and make those kinds of changes not be the default, but enabled through gconf would be a good thing too. Thanks again for you attention!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Neumair</title>
		<link>http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=24#comment-2990</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Neumair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=24#comment-2990</guid>
		<description>&#62; ‘multiple slots/documents’ in a common window is the wrong problem to solve =).

In theory you are right, and MDI is bad. However, since web browsers introduced this, many people are used to the behavior and want their applications to behave like that - at least that was my feeling. What we do is always a mixture out of what we want, what the usability experts want, and what our users want.

Note that you can always unset a GConf key and everything will be as before, i.e. no tabs / MDI windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; ‘multiple slots/documents’ in a common window is the wrong problem to solve =).</p>
<p>In theory you are right, and MDI is bad. However, since web browsers introduced this, many people are used to the behavior and want their applications to behave like that - at least that was my feeling. What we do is always a mixture out of what we want, what the usability experts want, and what our users want.</p>
<p>Note that you can always unset a GConf key and everything will be as before, i.e. no tabs / MDI windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kov</title>
		<link>http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=24#comment-2989</link>
		<dc:creator>kov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=24#comment-2989</guid>
		<description>I heartedly agree with you on providing solutions for today and tomorrow. I just think that 'multiple slots/documents' in a common window is the wrong problem to solve =).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heartedly agree with you on providing solutions for today and tomorrow. I just think that &#8216;multiple slots/documents&#8217; in a common window is the wrong problem to solve =).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Neumair</title>
		<link>http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=24#comment-2988</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Neumair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=24#comment-2988</guid>
		<description>You are not the only one who asked, but let me answer you here:

As soon as there is a convincing platform solution for displaying multiple windows/slots/documents in a common window with a common toolbar, we can adapt to it.

However, we have to provide satisfying solutions today and tomorrow, and not the day after tomorrow.

Best regards,
 Christian Neumair</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are not the only one who asked, but let me answer you here:</p>
<p>As soon as there is a convincing platform solution for displaying multiple windows/slots/documents in a common window with a common toolbar, we can adapt to it.</p>
<p>However, we have to provide satisfying solutions today and tomorrow, and not the day after tomorrow.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
 Christian Neumair</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
