Comments on: Regressions, ah, regressions http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=99 um hacker debiano que mora num lugar chamado mundo Tue, 07 Sep 2010 06:40:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Richard http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=99#comment-4919 Richard Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:11:18 +0000 http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=99#comment-4919 @David: Gmail works fine for me with Epiphany/webkit in Fedora 12. @kov: I still mean to file a bug about the seemingly random new window/new tab behaviour. Half the time I seem only able to open pages in new windows, and other times, only in tabs. It leaves me too baffled to file. @David: Gmail works fine for me with Epiphany/webkit in Fedora 12.

@kov: I still mean to file a bug about the seemingly random new window/new tab behaviour. Half the time I seem only able to open pages in new windows, and other times, only in tabs. It leaves me too baffled to file.

]]> By: kov http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=99#comment-4914 kov Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:50:31 +0000 http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=99#comment-4914 @David: I don't really use GMail too much, although I have been concerned to test it, and make things I notice breaking work. I know that some people do use the non-legacy version of GMail with no trouble. Perhaps you want to report bugs on your specific issues, so we can know about them, and fix them? =) @Zack: yeah, this was not to be a full list of regressions, just a small list of ones we already tackled (which is why these two didn't show up) - there are more, if you dig deep enough, but they're on track to get fixed ;) @Frederic: \o/ @David: I don’t really use GMail too much, although I have been concerned to test it, and make things I notice breaking work. I know that some people do use the non-legacy version of GMail with no trouble. Perhaps you want to report bugs on your specific issues, so we can know about them, and fix them? =)

@Zack: yeah, this was not to be a full list of regressions, just a small list of ones we already tackled (which is why these two didn’t show up) - there are more, if you dig deep enough, but they’re on track to get fixed ;)

@Frederic: \o/

]]> By: Frederic Peters http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=99#comment-4912 Frederic Peters Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:23:41 +0000 http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=99#comment-4912 Yeah for my little contribution :) More seriously you all rock, and I wish you all a great hackfest! Yeah for my little contribution :) More seriously you all rock, and I wish you all a great hackfest!

]]> By: Zack http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=99#comment-4911 Zack Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:40:27 +0000 http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=99#comment-4911 Two big regressions from epiphany-gecko that you didn't mention: - Visited-ness of URLs does not persist - Passwords are not saved Two big regressions from epiphany-gecko that you didn’t mention:

- Visited-ness of URLs does not persist
- Passwords are not saved

]]> By: David Weinehall http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=99#comment-4910 David Weinehall Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:35:08 +0000 http://blog.kov.eti.br/?p=99#comment-4910 Does the trunk version support the non-legacy version of gmail yet? Ever since epiphany switched to using webkit I've had to use the old html-only version of gmail rather than the default that uses javascript + html. I can fully understand esoteric regressions, but when basic functionality of a website that probably belongs in the top 100 sites in the world (since mail.google.com is a subdomain of google.com it's a bit hard to know, since the statistics I find seem to aggregate all of *.google.com into one) breaks, then something is rotten. Too bad, since epiphany is by far my favourite browser. Anyway, nice to hear you've been fixing regressions! Does the trunk version support the non-legacy version of gmail yet? Ever since epiphany switched to using webkit I’ve had to use the old html-only version of gmail rather than the default that uses javascript + html.

I can fully understand esoteric regressions, but when basic functionality of a website that probably belongs in the top 100 sites in the world (since mail.google.com is a subdomain of google.com it’s a bit hard to know, since the statistics I find seem to aggregate all of *.google.com into one) breaks, then something is rotten.

Too bad, since epiphany is by far my favourite browser.

Anyway, nice to hear you’ve been fixing regressions!

]]>